COVID-19 continues to create new challenges for all. To stay connected, we’re seeing businesses and consumers spend an increasing amount of time online – using different chat and video conferencing platforms to stay connected, and combat social distancing and self-isolation.

We’ve also seen the resurgence of interaction via video games during the lockdown, as we explore new ways to entertain ourselves and connect with others. However, a sudden influx of gamers also brings a new set of content moderation issues – for platform owners, games developers, and gamers alike.

Let’s take a closer look.


The video game industry was already in good shape before the global pandemic. In 2019, ISFE (Interactive Software Federation of Europe) reported a 15% rise between 2017 and 2018, turning over a combined €21bnAnother report by ISFE shows that over half of the EU’s population played video games in 2018 – some 250 million players, gaming for an average of nearly 9 hours per week: with a pretty even gender split.

It’s not surprising that the fastest growing demographic was the 25-34 age group – the generation who grew alongside Nintendo, Sony, and Microsoft consoles. However, gaming has broader demographic appeal too. A 2019 survey conducted by AARP (American Association Of Retired Persons) revealed that 44% of 50+ Americans enjoyed video games at least once a month.

According to GSD (Games Sales Data) in the week commencing 16th March 2020, right at the start of the lockdown, video games sales increased by 63% on the previous week. Digital sales have outstripped physical sales too, and console sales rose by 155% to 259,169 units in the same period.

But stats aside, when you consider the level of engagement possible, it’s clear that gaming is more than just ‘playing’. In April, the popular game Fortnite held a virtual concert with rapper Travis Scott; which was attended by no less than 12.3 million gamers around the world – a record audience for an in-game event.

Clearly, for gaming the only way is up right now. But given the sharp increases, and the increasingly creative and innovative ways gaming platforms are being used as social networks – how can developers ensure every gamer remains safe from bullying, harassment, and unwanted content?

Ready Player One?

If all games have one thing in common, it’s rules. The influx of new gamers presents new challenges in a number of ways, where content moderation is concerned. Firstly, because uninitiated gamers (often referred to as noob/newbie/nub) are likely to be unfamiliar with established, pre-existing rules for online multiplayer games or the accepted social niceties or jargon of different platforms.

From a new user’s perspective, there’s often a tendency to carry over offline behaviours into the online environment – without consideration or a full understanding of the consequences. The Gamer has an extensive list of etiquette guidelines which get frequently broken by online multiplayer gamers, from common courtesies such as not swearing in front of younger users on voice-chat, not spamming chat-boxes to not ‘rage-quitting’ a co-operative game due to frustration.

However, when playing in a global arena, gamers might also encounter subtle cultural differences and behave in a way which is considered offensive to certain other groups of people.

Another major concern, as outlined by Otis Burris, Besedo’s Vice President Of Partnerships, outlined in a recent interview, which affects all online platforms, is the need to “stay ahead of the next creative idea in scams and frauds or outright abuse, bullying and even grooming to protect all users” because “fraudsters, scammers and predators are always evolving.”

Multiplayer online gaming is open to negative exploitation by individuals with malicious intent or grooming, simply because of the potential anonymity and sheer numbers of gamers taking part simultaneously around the globe.

While The Gamer list spells out that kids (in particular) should never use someone else’s credit card to pay for in-game items, when you consider just how open gaming can be from an interaction perspective, the fact that these details could easily be obtained by deception or coercion needs to be tackled.

A New Challenger Has Entered

In terms of multiplayer online gaming, cyberbullying and its regulation continue to be a prevalent issue. Some of the potential ways in which users can manipulate gaming environments in order to bully others include:

  • Ganging up on other players
  • Sending or posting negative or hurtful messages (using in-game chat-boxes for example)
  • Swearing or making negative remarks about other players that turn into bullying
  • Excluding the other person from playing in a particular group
  • Anonymously harassing strangers
  • Duping more vulnerable gamers into revealing personal information (such as passwords)
  • Using peer pressure to push others into perform acts they wouldn’t normally have

Whilst cyberbullying amongst children is fairly well researched, negative online interactions between adults are less well documented and studied. The 2019 report ‘Adult Online Harms’ (commissioned by the UK Council for Internet Safety Evidence Group) investigated internet safety issues amongst UK adults, and even acknowledges the lack of research into the effect of cyberbullying on adults.

With so much to be on the lookout for, how can online gaming become a safer space to play in for children, teenagers, and adults alike?

Learn how to moderate without censoring

Why moderating content without censoring users demands consistent, transparent policies.



According to a 2019 report for the UK’s converged communications regulator Ofcom: “The fast-paced, highly-competitive nature of online platforms can drive businesses to prioritize growing an active user base over the moderation of online content.

“Developing and implementing an effective content moderation system takes time, effort and finance, each of which may be a constraint on a rapidly growing platform in a competitive marketplace.”

The stats show that 13% of people have stopped using an online service after observing harassment of others. Clearly, targeted harassment, hate speech, and social bullying need to stop if games manufacturers want to minimize churn rate and risk losing gamers to competitors.

So how can effective content moderation help?

Let’s look at a case study cited in the Ofcom report. As an example of effective content moderation, they refer to the online multiplayer game ‘League Of Legends’ which has approximately 80 million active players. The publishers, Riot Games, explored a new way of promoting positive interactions.

Users who logged frequent negative interactions were sanctioned with an interaction ‘budget’ or ‘limited chat mode’. Players who then modified their behavior and logged positive interactions gained release from the restrictions.

As a result of these sanctions, the developers noted a 7% drop in bad language in general and an overall increase in positive interactions.


Taking ‘League Of Legends’ as an example, a combination of human and AI (Artificial Intelligence) content moderation can encourage more socially positive content.

For example, a number of social media platforms have recently introduced ways of helpfully offering users alternatives to UGC (user generated content) which is potentially harmful or offensive, giving users a chance to self-regulate and make better choices before posting. In addition, offensive language within a post can be translated into non-offensive forms and users are presented with an optional ‘clean version’.

Nudging is also another technique which can be employed to encourage users to question and delay posting something potentially offensive by creating subtle incentives to make the right choice and thereby help to reduce the overall number of negative posts.

Chatbots, disguised as real users, can also be deployed to make interventions in response to specific negative comments posted by users, such as challenging racist or homophobic remarks and prompting an improvement in the user’s online behavior.

Finally, applying a layer of content moderation to ensure that inappropriate content is caught before it reaches other gamers will help keep communities positive and healthy. Ensuring higher engagement and less user leakage.

Game Over: Retry?

Making good from a bad situation, the current restrictions on social interaction offer a great opportunity for the gaming industry to draw in a new audience and broaden the market.

It also continues to inspire creative innovations in artistry and immersive storytelling, offering new and exciting forms of entertainment, pushing the boundaries of technological possibility, and generating new business models.

But the gaming industry also needs to ensure it takes greater responsibility for the safety of gamers online by ensuring it incorporates robust content management strategies. Even if doing so at scale, especially when audience numbers are so great, takes a lot more than manual player intervention or reactive strategies alone.

This is a challenge we remain committed to at Besedo – using technology to meet the moderation needs of all digital platforms. Through a combination of machine learning, artificial intelligence, and manual moderation techniques we can build a bespoke set of solutions that can operate at scale.

To find out more about content moderation and gaming, or to arrange a product demonstration, contact our team!

This is Besedo

Global, full-service leader in content moderation

We provide automated and manual moderation for online marketplaces, online dating, sharing economy, gaming, communities and social media.

Form background

Users’ expectations are at an all-time high, and losing your customers to your competition is out of the question. Platforms need to do everything they can to ensure a seamless and safe experience on their site. That’s why content moderation has never been more vital to gain and retaining customers.

Browsing the web for content moderation statistics? Look no further. We have compiled a list of 65 statistics about the landscape of content moderation, from user experience to customer service or stats relating to your specific industry.

  • User Experience
  • Reviews
  • Dating
  • Sharing economy
  • Online marketplaces
  • Customer service
  • Scams
  • Online harassment

User Experience

Online shoppers have no time to waste. They are expecting to find what they are looking for instantly. Competing for users’ attention is a tricky business. Only one negative experience can send your users away, seeking a better place to shop from.

Categorization, smooth navigation, good searchability, and no duplicates play a key role in creating a seamless experience to win customers and keep them coming back.

  • One in three consumers says they will walk away from a brand they love after just one bad experience. – PWC
  • First impressions are 94% design-related. – Research Gate
  • A study shows that 60% of consumers start their research on a search engine before visiting a specific website. – on Adweek
  • When they visited a mobile-friendly site, 74% of people say they’re more likely to return to that site in the future. – Think with Google
  • 42% of shoppers abandon an online purchase because of limited product information. – Biz report
  • Around 87% of online shoppers abandon their carts during the checkout if the process is too long or complicated. – Splitit
  • The average cart abandonment rate at 69.5 percent in 2019. – Statista
  • 55% of website visitors spend less than 15 seconds actively reading. – FreelancingGig
  • 53% of mobile site visits leave a page that takes longer than three seconds to load. – Think with Google
  • Slow-loading sites increase the abandonment rate by 79.17%. – SaleCycle
  • 30 % of shoppers say that the loading time of a website is the most important feature. Magento Commerce report
  • 100% of the participants found irrelevant items in their search results. Besedo user search study


Reviews can make or break your business, with customers relying more and more on reviews to buy products or services (and even trusting fellow online reviewers as much as their friends and family) genuine user reviews are an excellent way for users to gain trust in your platform.

However, fake reviews multiply quickly online, which could erode the trust needed to convert buyers. So, how can you prevent fake reviews on your site? Setting up a reliable content moderation process is your best bet to protect your site. Find out more about tackling fake reviews here.

  • 82% of consumers have read a fake review in the last year. – Bright Local
  • 85% of consumers are willing to leave reviews. – Bright Local
  • More than 8 in 10 say user-generated content from people they don’t know influences what they buy and indicates brand quality. – Hubspot
  • 76% trust online reviews as much as recommendations from family and friends. – Bright Local
  • 88% of consumers trust online reviews as much as personal recommendations. – Bright Local
  • 73% of Millennials say that consumers care more about customer opinions than companies themselves do. – Hubspot
  • 93% of consumers say that user-generated content can help them make purchasing decisions. – Adweek
  • Around 30 percent of online consumers said they posted product feedback online, and, in Asia, consumers were nearly 50 percent more likely than average to post a review. – KPMG
  • 90% of customers are influenced by positive reviews when buying a product. – Zendesk


Heterosexual couples are more likely to meet a romantic partner online than through personal contacts and connections, according to a recent study. The dating industry is booming, yet it is still facing countless challenges: rude messages, inappropriate images, and in the worst of cases, sexual harassment.

You need to handle these threats with an effective content moderation strategy to succeed in the business. The following online dating stats will give you a better idea of the challenges to be faced head-on.

  • 41% said of participants to a study said they are afraid of dating scams. – MeasuringU
  • 51% of women say safety was a concern when meeting with people resulting from a match on a dating app. – Once survey
  • 42% of women reported being “contacted by someone through an online dating site or app in a way that made them feel harassed or uncomfortable. – Pew Research
  • Nearly 40% of people surveyed have “swipe fatigue” because these apps are superficial, geared towards casual relationships, and don’t have adequate safety features. – Once survey
  • 34% of participants have been contacted in a way that made them uncomfortable. – Statista
  • Around the world, 600 million singles have access to the Internet. 400 million of these have never used a dating app. – TechCrunch
  • 82% say they would feel more secure using a dating app with public ratings. – Once survey

Sharing economy

The sharing economy is forging its way into all types of industries, from the gig economy to transportation or housing, and no sector will be left untouched in the future. Yet, the sharing industry comes with its own set of challenges, privacy and safety being the two leading causes of concern.

  • The number of sharing economy users is set to reach 86.5 million in the U.S. in 2021. – Statista
  • Fears’ consumers addressed issues of value and quality, articulated as concerns about “sharing not being worth the effort” (12 percent), “goods/services being of poor quality” (12 percent) and “other factors” (9 percent). – Campbell Mithun and Carbonview
  • 67% of consumers’ fears about the sharing economy are related to trust. – Campbell Mithun and Carbonview
  • In a 2017 survey, 36 percent of the respondents said privacy concerns were a reason not to use Airbnb, and 13 percent stated safety concerns as a reason not to use the app. – Statista
  • Over the past five years, the Car Sharing Providers industry has grown by 8.9% to reach revenue of $1bn in 2019. – Ibis World
  • McKinsey estimates that in the U.S. and Europe alone, 162 million people, or 20-30 percent of the workforce, are providers of sharing platforms. – McKinsey

Online marketplaces

With conscious consumerism on the rise, online marketplaces are trendier daily. But in this competitive environment, online marketplaces need to set themselves apart. Optimizing your platform’s experience is necessary if you wish to stay in the race.

  • Marketplaces generate significant revenue, two-thirds generating more than $50 million annually and one-third generating $100 million or more. – Altimeter
  • 21x, that’s how much faster resale has grown over retail over the past three years. – ThredUp
  • Lack of sellers who meet their needs (53%) is the single biggest reason buyers leave marketplaces. – Altimeter
  • By 2021, 53.9% of all U.S. retail eCommerce is expected to be generated through mobile commerce. – Statista
  • 56% of consumers would buy more from off-price retailers if they offered secondhand apparel, and one-third said the same was true of fast-fashion retailers. – ThredUp
  • The digital classifieds ad revenue in the U.S. grew by 8.3 percent in 2018 compared to the previous year. – Statista
  • Nearly half (48 percent) of online shoppers head straight to a large eCommerce marketplace.  – Big-commerce and Square study
  • Only 20% would buy the product in an ad with poor description and 73% were unlikely to return to the site. Compared to 56% and 37% for a good listing. Besedo user search study

Customer service

Customer service has become progressively more important for customers in the past few years. Have a look at the following statistics to help you improve your customer service and become their preferred platform.

  • According to a survey by Customer Care Measurement and Consulting the Carey School of Business at the Arizona State University, over three-quarters of complaining consumers were less than satisfied with their experience with the given company’s customer service department. – Customer Care Measurement and Consulting
  • 63% of customers are happy to be served by a chatbot if there is an option to escalate the conversation to a human. – Forrester
  • 73% say that valuing their time is the most important thing a company can do to provide them with good online customer service. – Forrester
  • 95% of customers tell others about a bad experience, and 87% share good experiences. – Zendesk
  • 90% of customers rate an “immediate” response as important or very important when they have a customer service question. 60% of customers define “immediate” as 10 minutes or less. – HubSpot Research
  • Investing in new customers is between 5 and 25 times more expensive than retaining existing ones. – Invesp


Scams can be found everywhere, and because of their sophistication level can be hard to detect or get rid of. Still, scams hurt businesses and drive user trust away. Check out our blog post on the 5 common online marketplace scams to see how you can fight back.

  • Fifty-five percent of businesses surveyed reported increased online fraud-related losses over the past 12 months. – Experian
  • 75% who saw a scam on a site would not return. – Besedo user search study
  • Only half of companies believe that they have a high level of understanding about how fraud affects their business. – Experian
  • 27% abandoned a transaction due to a lack of visible security. – Experian
  • Nearly 1.5 million phishing sites are created each month. – Dashlane blog
  • The median individual loss to a romance scam reported in 2018 was $2,600, about seven times higher than the median loss across all other fraud types. – FTC
  • 74% of consumers see security as the most important element of their online experience, followed by convenience. – Experian
  • 43.19% of the first page results for Gucci bag were counterfeits. Besedo mystery shopping study
  • Nearly 60 percent of consumers worldwide have experienced online fraud at some point. – Experian
  • In Australia, reports for financial losses due to scams reached 16.9% in December 2019 compared to 7.8% in December 2018. – Scamwatch
  • In Australia, investment scams are the top scam in terms of losses followed by dating ones. – Scamwatch
  • In our study, 50% of participants encountered something they thought was a scam. – Besedo user search study

Online harassment

Online harassment is a plague with dire consequences. Get to know the following stats to better your content moderation and fight back on online harassment.

  • 1 in 2 young people reported having experienced online bullying before the age of 25. – Universities U.K.
  • 41% of American adults have experienced online harassment, and 66% of adults have witnessed at least one harassing behavior online. – Pew Research
  • 62% of U.K. youth participants reported they had received nasty private messages via social media, of which 42% were hate-based comments on race, sexuality, or gender identity. – Universities U.K.
  • More than a tenth of Americans have experienced mental or emotional stress (and 8% have experienced problems with friends and family) due to online harassment. – Pew Research
  • 81 percent of women and 43 percent of men had experienced some form of sexual harassment during their lifetime. – GfK

This is Besedo

Global, full-service leader in content moderation

We provide automated and manual moderation for online marketplaces, online dating, sharing economy, gaming, communities and social media.

Form background

Tackling inappropriate sexual behavior on dating sites and apps means having some difficult conversations about online conduct. But awareness is the first step on the road to prevention. Besedo spoke with online dating safety expert Chris Dietzel about some of the challenges and behaviors society needs to address.

Sexual harassment isn’t just lurking in human society’s dark corners. It’s very much out in the open. The number of brave women who expressed a single #MeToo during the recent social media campaign was alarming, to say the least.

But it also highlighted uncertainty around the definition of sexual harassment. While many conversations are being had about what physically constitutes sexual harassment, there’s been little examination of the topic in digital environments. But online dating safety expert, Chris Dietzel, hopes to change that.

However, he believes that one of the biggest problems we face is that many people just aren’t aware of how damaging unwanted behaviors can be. This is down to the fact that acceptance of inappropriateness is something that’s deeply ingrained in modern culture.

Photo by Markus Spiske on Unsplash

Knowing the limits

A Ph.D. at McGill University in Montreal, Canada, Chris turned his attention to online dating after researching people’s experiences on certain sites and apps.

“A lot of the inappropriate behaviors and sexual advances many condemn in offline environments – such as in the workplace or in social settings – aren’t always deemed as serious or damaging or problematic in a digital context,” he explains.

The definition of sexual harassment is essentially anything unwanted that’s sexual in nature. Online, it could be sexual communication that’s intimidating, predatory, or humiliating. It could be an image or inappropriate text. Perhaps unsolicited or insistent messages. Jokes, even. And while we can argue that between consenting adults, these could be accepted online, there can be a high degree of uncertainty that true consent is mutual between two people.

“Context and permission are the keywords here,” says Chris. “Problems arise if there’s no open understanding or consent agreement between the individuals. In online dating, permission parameters are too often based on assumptions about what one individual thinks the other wants. For example, two people may flirt on a dating app. While one person might assume that a conversation like this is a prelude to sex, the other may simply enjoy the lighthearted conversation.”

While it’s clear that there can easily be a communication breakdown, what isn’t immediately apparent is how more extreme online behaviors creep in. While it’s logical (but definitely not excusable) that someone might lash out after being rejected, responding by publicly sharing an intimate photo is an extreme response. Actions like this fall under the banner of a word that many would be shocked to hear associated with online activity: rape.

Defining rape culture

Putting something as extreme as “rape” in a cultural context is admittedly an uncomfortable topic. While the word unequivocally refers to sexual violence, the term ‘rape culture’ requires definition, as it considers a complex set of behaviors that many may not even consider problematic.

Chris works on “IMPACTS: Collaborations to Address Sexual Violence on Campus,” a seven-year project that addresses sexual violence on university campuses across Canada and internationally. The IMPACTS Project, which is housed at McGill, defines rape culture as How sexist societal attitudes, misogyny, and language tacitly condone, minimize and/or normalize sexual violence — mostly against women, but also against other genders.

“Online, these behaviors are evident in how some people communicate about sex and violence. In fact, in some cases, people might not even be aware that they’re condoning it because certain terms, phrases, and behaviors have become normalized in mainstream cultures,” Chris explains.

“Admittedly, some are glaringly obvious — such as the infamous ‘grab them by the pussy’ slur — but other misogynistic terms, or even just the way in which sex and violence are referred to casually, illustrate widespread acceptance of inappropriateness as a cultural norm.”

For example, many women are simply resigned to the fact that they are likely to experience some form of sexual harassment when they join an online dating service. They feel it’s a given that, at some point, they be sent inappropriate images and messages.

“The reason very little comes of these situations, and why so much goes unreported, is because people don’t actually know how to handle these behaviors,” says Chris. “They accept it as part of the dating app experience, that they have to deal with problematic individuals to find someone decent.”

Of course, those receiving the unwanted messages can delete the conversation and block the sender. They can even delete the app. But the damage has been done, and measures like these do nothing to stigmatize the sender; because the reaction is carried out by the recipient. In this situation, the ‘crime’ goes unpunished.

“Under these circumstances, many see it as difficult to assign blame,” Chris says. “Who’s at fault? The other person? The app? Yourself? Did your profile pic look too provocative? People often blame themselves when they feel victimized. And that makes them increasingly vulnerable.”

Rape myths, such as an individual feeling responsible for the sexual harassment they endured, are so ingrained in a culture that victims of sexual violence may not know how to address the problems they encounter, particularly in online spaces.

Power and social capital

Wherever there’s a visible distinction between a majority and a minority, there’s an unbalanced power dynamic at work. When a norm is perceived, those that adhere to it – the majority – wield more social capital than those who don’t – the minority.

“For example, if person A has more social capital than person B — they’re more likely to abuse their power and try to manipulate person B,” explains Chris. “On the other side, if person B accepts the fact person A has more social capital than them, they’re more likely to tolerate abusive behavior from person A. This is what puts marginalized people at greater risk of being victimized.”

In a recent social experiment, a What’s the Flip?” video highlighted the difference in social capital on a gay-oriented dating app when a White male and an Asian male swapped profiles. In the clip, the profile of the White male receives tons of messages, while the profile of the Asian male receives very few. As a socially-desired individual with his choice of guys, the White male holds more social capital than the Asian male.

We also see that marginalized individuals, like the Asian male in this example, may be more willing to engage in less desirable situations or with unfavorable people out of a desire for social interaction. The marginalized individual feels lucky when someone approaches them since they do not receive as much attention as privileged folks, and this might mean they lower their standards and go along with things that they might not normally do. This is not to suggest that marginalized people or those with less social capital are powerless; rather, it suggests that there is a greater opportunity for abuse and manipulation when there are differences in social capital.

These dynamics don’t just manifest in real life. Online social capital counts too. And nowhere else is its dominance so visible: in the number of followers someone has on a social network; the number of comments; views; clicks etc. This means that online social media presence can inflate their social capital and give them more influence. Compared to other types of social power, influence in an online context is measurable, and the potential to abuse that power can be a very dangerous thing where sexual harassment is concerned.

The impact of technology

The sheer number of ways in which sexual harassment can happen online is troubling. It can be very public, in a social network or public forum, or in a private email, direct message, or in-app chat. Or it can easily and quickly move from one to place to another, and as technology evolves, so will the way that people interact in online dating.

“It’s easy to take for granted just how quickly things can spread online,” says Chris. “A comment, image, or video can be shared with thousands of people in seconds, which can have a tremendously negative emotional impact on an individual.”

“As the lines between real and virtual worlds converge, the environments in which dating and the associated conversations take place will shift too. But we’ll still see harassment-related issues defined by context and environment – the platform used and the conversations being had. “Ultimately, wherever there’s a system, people will abuse it. This is why the only real solution is education and awareness – to normalize discussion of sexual harassment; in conjunction with other proactive, rather than prohibitive, measures.”

Normalizing awareness

To change things, we need to be able to have honest and open discussions about sexual harassment and make it clear that it does exist online as much as anywhere else. According to Chris, education is a key component to making this happen, but the onus shouldn’t just be on public service and charity campaigns. Technology companies have a role to play too.

“App and site developers have an incredible opportunity to push progress forward and provide their users with information on acceptable behaviors, videos, links, and insights,” explains Chris. “But it’s about being proactive too; setting standards and expectations.”

Chris also points out that most apps’ Terms & Conditions only cover behaviors relating to the app and the users — not between users and other users, which is why community standards are important.

“I think that it’s important to have standards that users abide by too. Facebook does this. So does the dating app Chappy. Additionally, awareness of differences is important. Grindr has just included options to allow users to define their preferred personal pronouns. To help educate those curious but don’t fully understand these issues, there’s an info button on the same page that explains what this all means and why people would specify that information.”

“At the end of the day, self-respect and respect for others are crucial in combating discrimination and harassment of any kind. By having honest dialogues with individuals about a range of issues – everything from identity to inappropriateness – we can raise more awareness about sexual harassment and better prevent it,” says Chris. “Shaming one person won’t necessarily change behavior but getting a group of people to reflect on their actions will.”

“We are all responsible for what we tolerate as individuals. However, organizations and companies – and society as a whole – need to step up to the plate and model the message of zero tolerance against sexual harassment. That’s the only way it will truly take effect.”

About Chris Dietzel

Christopher Dietzel, Ph.D., is a research associate on the iMPACTS Project and works in the Sexual Health and Gender (SHaG) Lab. Dr. Dietzel’s research explores the intersections of gender, sexuality, health, safety, and technology. Recently, his interests have focused on issues of consent and sexual violence, particularly related to mobile apps and LGBTQ+ people. 

This is Besedo

Global, full-service leader in content moderation

We provide automated and manual moderation for online marketplaces, online dating, sharing economy, gaming, communities and social media.

Form background

Few things can damage your user trust and site reputation more than online sexual harassment. Disturbing images, profanities and unprovoked harassment are sadly becoming a norm in the online dating world, and many users are experiencing personal violation in their very first encounter on a dating site.

A survey done by Pew Research Center shows that 41% of Americans have been personally subjected to harassing behavior online, and 66% have witnessed these behaviors directed at others. 79% of users believe that it’s the site’s responsibility to step in and protect their users when online harassment is taking place on their website.

Negative user experiences due to sexual harassment have created opportunities for differentiation within the online dating industry. Bumble, for example, has taken the market by storm with one simple and clear strategy; protect their female users from online harassment. They’ve managed to steal market shares, almost overnight, by giving women the sole power of initiating the first contact. This leaves room for thought.

What would it mean for your churn rates if you could make online harassment a non-issue?

Watch our CCO, Shane Correa address the issue of online sexual harassment and share actionable insights on how you can protect your users and avoid sexual harassment-induced churn.

Are you a victim of online sexual harassment? read our interview with the internet safety advocate Sue Scheff.

If you are ready to embrace your social responsibility and want to fight online sexual harassment, reach out to us and we’ll help you get started to protect your users.

Engage with our hashtag: #wetoo, on social media.

This is Besedo

Global, full-service leader in content moderation

We provide automated and manual moderation for online marketplaces, online dating, sharing economy, gaming, communities and social media.

Form background

Sue Scheff is an author, parent advocate and cyber advocate who is promoting awareness of cyberbullying and other online issues. She is the author of three books, Wit’s EndShame Nation and Google Bomb.

We had the opportunity to conduct an interview with her where she talked about victims experience of online sexual harassment/online shaming and shared her opinion on what sites can do to help fight the problem. 

Interviewer: Hi Sue, thanks a lot for taking the time to share your knowledge, I know you are extremely busy! You’re the author of Shame Nation and Google Bomb, what were you hoping to achieve by releasing them?

Sue Scheff: Awareness. Most importantly, giving a voice to the voiceless.

After I wrote Google Bomb I was stunned by the outpour of people from all walks of life – from all over the world – that contacted me with their stories of Internet defamation/shaming/harassment. People were silently suffering from cyber-bullets, like myself, on the verge of financial ruin and all were emotionally struggling.

Google Bomb was the roadmap to helping people know there are legal ramifications and consequences of online behavior.

By 2012, I was taken back by the constant headlines of bullycide. Names like Tyler Clementi, Amanda Todd, Rebecca Sedwick, Audrie Potts – I knew how they felt – like there was no escaping this dark-hole of cyber-humiliation. At 40 years-old, when this happened to me, I had the maturity to know it would eventually get better. These young people don’t.

Google Bomb was the book to help people understand their legal rights, but with the rise of incivility online, Shame Nation needed to be written to help people know they can survive digital-embarrassment, revenge porn, sextortion and other forms of online hate. I packed this book with over 25 contributors and experts from around the world – to share their first-hand stories to help readers know they can overcome digital disaster. I also include digital wisdom for online safety and survival.

Interviewer: You’re a victim of online harassment and won a landmark case of internet defamation and invasion of privacy. Can you please try to explain your experience?

Sue Scheff: In 2003, I was attacked online by what I refer to as a disgruntled client, definitely a woman that didn’t like me. Once she started her attack, the gang-like mentality of trolls joined in. These trolls and this woman created a smear campaign that took an evil twist. From calling me a child abuser,  saying I kidnap kids, exploit families, a crook and more. Things went towards the sexual side when they claimed to be auctioning my panties (of course they never meet me – or had anything) but to anyone reading this, how do you explain these are malicious trolls out to destroy me?

As an educational consultant, I help families with at-risk teens find residential treatment centers. These online insults nearly destroyed me. I ended up having to close my office, hire an attorney and fight.

By 2006 I was both emotionally and financially crippled. In September 2006 I won the landmark case in Florida for Internet defamation and invasion of privacy for $11.3M in a jury verdict. Lady Justice cleared my name, but the Internet never forgets. Fortunately for me, the first online reputation management company opens their doors that summer. I was one of their first clients. To this day – I say my lawyer vindicated me – but it’s ORM that gave me my life back.

Interviewer: You’ve also met many other victims of online harassment, online shaming, revenge porn etc. How are victims affected, both in short and long-term?

Sue Scheff: Trust and resilience.

I’ve spoken to many victims of online hate. The most common theme I hear is the lack of trust we (they) have of others (both online and offline) initially. With me, I know I become very isolated and reserved. My circle of trusted friends became extremely small – the fact is, no one understands this pain unless they have walked in your shoes. When researching Shame Nation – others expressed feeling the same way.

The good news is, with time we learn to rebuild our trust in humanity through our own resilience. This doesn’t happen overnight. It’s about acceptance – understanding that the shame doesn’t define you and it’s your opportunity to redefine yourself.

The survivors you will read about in Shame Nation have inspiring stories of hope. They all learned to redefine themselves – out of negative experiences. It’s what I did – and realized that many others have done the same.

Interviewer: Where do you see the biggest risk of being exposed to online sexual harassment?

Sue Scheff: Online reputation and emotional distress.

Today we face the majority of businesses and universities that will use the Internet to search your name prior “interviewing” you. Depending on how your name survives a Google rinse cycle, it will dictate your financial future – career or job wise.

Just because you have a job – doesn’t mean you’re out of hot water. More than 80% of companies have social media policies in place. If your name is involved in sexual misconduct (scandal) online – you could risk losing your job. Colleges are also implementing these social media policies.

PEW Research says the most common way for adults to meet – is online. If you’re a victim of cyber-shame, online sexual harassment, revenge porn or sextortion – this content could hinder your chances of meeting your soul mate.

The emotional distress is overwhelming. You feel powerless and hopeless. Thankfully today there are resources you can turn to for help.

Interviewer: Do you think this issue is growing or are we any closer to solving it?

Sue Scheff: Yes… and no.

In a 2017 PEW survey, over 80% of researchers predicted that online harassment will get worse over the next decade – this includes revenge porn and sexual harassment. This is a man-made disaster, and can only be remedied by each of us taking responsibility for our actions online and educating others. Education is the key to prevention. I believe the #MeToo and Times Up movement have brought more awareness to this topic, but I fear not enough is being done about it for the online world. It’s too easy to use a keypad as a legal lethal weapon.

The good news is that we are seeing stronger revenge porn laws being put in place, as well as more social platforms, are responding to removing content when flagged as abusive. Years ago, we didn’t have this – though it may be slow, it’s moving in the right direction.

Learn how to moderate without censoring

Why moderating content without censoring users demands consistent, transparent policies.


Interviewer: What would be your advice to internet users today on how to avoid, prevent and fight harassment?

Sue Scheff: Digital wisdom.

I’m frequently asked, “how can I safely sext my partner?” I give the same answer every time. The Internet and social media were not and is not intended for privacy. We only have to think of the Sony email hacking or Ashley Madison leaks to know that no one is immune to have their private habits exposed to the world wide web. You should have zero expectancies of privacy if sending any sexual message via text or otherwise. Several studies concur – a majority of adults will share personal and private messages and images of their partner without their partner’s consent.

Your friend today could quickly turn into a foe tomorrow. Divorce rates are climbing – what used to be revenge offline with charging up your ex’s credit cards, now has longer-term consequences when your nudes can go viral or other comprising images or content. E-venge (such as revenge porn) is how ex’s will take out their anger. Don’t give them that power.

If you find you are a victim of online harassment or online hate – report it and flag it to the social platform. Be sure to fill out a form – outlining how it’s violating their code of conduct – email them professionally (never use profanity or a harsh tone).

I encourage victims not to engage with the harasser. Be sure to screenshot the content – then block them. If you feel this is a case that will get worse and it needs to be monitored, you can ask a friend to monitor it for you so you don’t have to be emotionally drained from it. I also tell the friend not to engage – and to let you know if it gets to a point that it may need legal attention – that your life is in danger or your business is suffering.

Interviewer: What is your opinion on what sites can do to help fight this problem?

Sue Scheff: In a perfect world – we would say stricter consequences offline for the perpetrators – which would hinder them from doing this online in the first place.

Strengthen the gatekeepers: User -friendlier and a speedier response time.

Although sites such as Facebook, Twitter and Instagram are stepping up and want to alleviate online harassment, many people still struggle with figuring out the reporting methods and especially the poor response time. Where are the forms? After that – the response time can be troubling – from what victims have shared with me. When you’re a victim of sexual harassment, these posts are extremely concerning – every minute feels like a year.

I personally had a good experience on Facebook – when I wrote about a cyber-stalker on my public page. It was addressed and handled within 48 hours.

Systems should be in place that if a comment/image is flagged as abusive (harassment) by more than 3-5 unique visitors, it should be taken down until it can be investigated by the social platform’s team. I think we can relate to the fact that online abuse reported daily is likely overwhelming social media platforms – however, I believe they should give us the benefit of the doubt until they can investigate our complaint.

Interviewer: What do you think about the idea of using computer vision (AI) to spot and block nude pictures before they are submitted on a dating site?

Sue Scheff: If dating sites were able to implement AI for suspicious content, it would be a great start to cut-back on sexual harassment and keeping the users safer.

Interviewer: Where can victims turn for support?

Sue Scheff:

Are you a victim of online sexual harassment or cyberbullying?

Please heed Sue’s advice and reach out for support.

If you are site looking to help in the fight?

Contact us to see how AI and content moderation can help keep your users safe.

Sue Scheff - fight online harassment

Sue Scheff

Sue Scheff is a Nationally Recognized Author, Parent Advocate and Internet Safety Advocate. She founded Parents Universal Resources Experts, Inc. in 2001.

This is Besedo

Global, full-service leader in content moderation

We provide automated and manual moderation for online marketplaces, online dating, sharing economy, gaming, communities and social media.

Form background

Sexual harassment has featured heavily in the media of late, as scores of women who’ve remained quiet about their experiences have bravely spoken out with a simple yet meaningful hashtag: #MeToo.

While the highly inexcusable exploits of men in positions of power, like Harvey Weinstein (among many others) may now be well documented, undesirable activity doesn’t have to be anywhere near as precarious to qualify as sexual harassment; particularly in digital environments like dating websites and messaging apps.

According to one study in Australia, the harassment of women online has become a ‘digital norm’ with nearly half of all women experiencing abuse or harassment online – including 76% of those under 30. These worrying statistics are just the tip of the iceberg. While much is being done to raise awareness of online harassment, for many it’s both unclear what exactly constitutes it and many dating sites still struggle with how to deal with it.

Defining online sexual harassment

According to Childnet International, an organisation that promotes internet safety for young people, there are four types of online sexual harassment

  • Non consensual sharing of intimate images and videos — for example, revenge porn.
  • Exploitation, coercion and threats — such as blackmailing someone with compromising images of themselves.
  • Sexualised bullying — includes so called ‘slut-shaming’: demonising women for dressing provocatively.
  • Unwanted sexualisation — this covers a wide range of behaviours from unwanted and even unprompted messages to making inappropriate comments about someone’s appearance.

It appears that while some instances of sexual harassment criteria are obvious, others could be seen as arbitrary – particularly in the ‘Unwanted’ category. Why? Because what one person may find appropriate may in fact cause harm to another. Since the Weinstein allegations much has been made of ways to tackle individual behaviour from both a female and male perspective, but what are dating sites doing to tackle sexual harassment?

Education and empowerment

Organisations such as the Online Dating Association in the UK place a strong focus on educating consumers and online dating businesses about best practices, including ways to keep users safe from sexual predators.

However, while more needs to be done to prevent extreme cases, there also needs to be greater focus on prevention, which means taking a stance on inappropriate messaging. You only have to look at Bye Felipe on Instagram to see some prime examples of just how casual obscenity has become.

And then there’s Bumble: the first dating app to be specifically designed for women. It’s core value is advancing, empowering, and helping women. Like other dating services, it only initiates contact when there’s a mutual match, but unlike other services women make the first move. And it’s now the fastest growing dating site in the world

Learn how to moderate without censoring

Why moderating content without censoring users demands consistent, transparent policies.


Making a stand

As more women take a stand on harassment, inappropriate comments are going to be called out more frequently. That’s why it’s vital that women in the public eye continue to speak out against sexual harassment – as Oprah Winfrey did at this year’s Golden Globes– in order to give others hope, encouragement, and courage.

But the issue cannot be solved by individuals alone. Companies have a huge social responsibility and need to weigh in too. Popular platforms and companies must play their part. Speaking out is one thing. But more can be done. Dating and classified sites can help protect their users via content moderation; an effective way of monitoring, flagging and removing inappropriate images and messages. Not only does it counter sexual harassment, it’ll reduce user churn too.

There’s a clear difference between malicious behaviour and accidental offence. And while it’s relatively straightforward to create content moderation filters that flag specific words and phrases, what’s less easy to achieve is an understanding of context. But it is possible: through a combination of machine-learning and manual moderation.

No-one should have to endure fear or humiliation of any kind, at any time, in any place: on-or offline. As an increasing number of online marketplaces, classifieds, and dating sites put more stringent measures in place to prevent harassment, perhaps those who’ve been guilty of sexual harassment in the past will think twice before sending an inappropriate message.

In the meantime, the tide is turning against offenders and the issues affecting so many is firmly in the public spotlight. Change is coming, but we can’t rest until then. Here at Besedo, we’re trying to raise awareness through our #WeToo social media campaign. Why not join us?

This is Besedo

Global, full-service leader in content moderation

We provide automated and manual moderation for online marketplaces, online dating, sharing economy, gaming, communities and social media.

Form background